Work management that works
for both sides of the floor.
Managers need visibility, scheduling, and adoption health signals. Technicians need a clean queue, fast close-out, and asset history without drilling. Most CMMS systems build for one and ignore the other. We build for both.
For maintenance managers
The visibility you need to run a proactive program
Most CMMS give you a list of work orders. That's not enough. You need to see what's slipping, what's at risk, and whether your team is actually using the system — before any of those become a leadership conversation you weren't ready for.
See reactive vs. planned before it becomes a crisis
A rolling 12-month chart of planned vs. reactive work orders across your site. Going from 70% reactive to 55% is the most meaningful number you can show leadership — we make it easy to screenshot.
A scheduling board that actually works
Drag work orders onto a technician's week. Unscheduled backlog in a side panel sorted by priority and asset criticality. See at a glance who is overloaded and what isn't covered — without a spreadsheet.
Backlog with risk, not just a list
Operations shouldn't just see a list of deferred work orders — they should see the consequence of deferring each one. Surface risk per item, let operations formally accept or defer with a timestamp. Maintenance conveys risk; operations owns the decision.
Adoption health before it quietly dies
Admin dashboard surfaces pencil-whipping patterns (PMs closed in under 60 seconds with no notes), data completeness per asset, and work order close-out lag — before the system silently becomes shelfware.
PM Compliance
74%
+8% vs last month
Reactive rate
61%
−11% vs last month
Avg. close time
4.2h
−0.8h vs last month
Data quality
68%
Assets with full nameplate
Reactive vs. planned — rolling 12 months
For technicians
A tool they'll actually use at the end of a long shift
Technician adoption is the number one reason CMMS investments fail. Not features — adoption. We design every close-out flow, every queue view, and every mobile interaction with one question: would a tired tech at the end of a 10-hour shift actually do this?
Close a work order in three taps
Completion status, failure code from a dropdown, optional notes. Duration auto-fills from your start/stop timestamps. No mandatory fields that appear only at submission. No multi-screen flows for a simple PM.
"What was done last time?" — answered in seconds
Every work order, meter reading, and part used on an asset is visible in a scrollable timeline on the asset screen. No drilling into sub-menus. No asking the foreman. Just look.
Your queue, not a wall of noise
Technicians see only work assigned to them, sorted by priority and due date. No clutter from other teams, other sites, or work orders irrelevant to their role. A clean list they actually trust.
No surprises at close-out
Required fields are shown on the work order before you start — not revealed when you try to submit. If a failure code is required, you know when you open the job, not after you've written up your notes.
From request to closed — the loop that builds adoption
Adoption compounds when the loop closes. Operators who submit a request and hear back start submitting more. Technicians who see clean history start adding to it.
Request submitted
Operator scans QR on asset → browser form → no login required
Work order created
Manager reviews, assigns tech, sets priority from asset criticality
Technician notified
Push notification + work order appears in their mobile queue
Job executed
Tech opens job plan steps, checks parts, records readings
Close-out
Three fields, one tap — failure code, status, optional note
Loop closes
Operator gets email: "Done. Here's what was found." Adoption follows.
See how work management improves adoption in the first 30 days
We'll walk through a full work order lifecycle — from operator request to technician close-out — using your vertical's asset types.
Request a demo