The killer feature

Every other CPM ends at the binder.
Sympl ends at a live CMMS.

Closeout is the only CPM module that produces a deliverable for a different product. At substantial completion, the Sympl · Project submittal log materializes as the asset registry in the owner's Sympl · CMMS — manufacturers, models, serials, install dates, warranties, O&M manuals, and recommended PMs. The building operates on day one.

Become a design partner Back to Sympl · Project

Today's failure mode

The smart building, dumb on day one.

The closeout binder is a 50GB ZIP of PDFs delivered on a thumb drive. The facilities team types into the CMMS for six months. Half the warranties are wrong by then. PM frequencies are guessed. Spare parts orphaned. Closeout takes 3–9 months after substantial completion. Final retention release blocks on missing items the GC PM is still chasing.

The submittal log already contains the asset registry. Every piece of equipment has been cataloged, approved, and filed before it was installed. The data exists — it just lives in a PDF instead of an operating system.

What today's closeout looks like

  • 3–9 months from substantial completion to "done"
  • 200+ PM hours chasing O&Ms, warranties, attic stock
  • 50GB ZIP of PDFs on a thumb drive at delivery
  • 6 months of retyping into the operator's CMMS
  • Half of warranties wrong by the time data lands
  • PM frequencies guessed from generic vendor manuals

How closeout actually works

Two parallel tracks. One convergence point.

Physical and financial closeout run in parallel and converge at final acceptance. Tying them together is what lets the CFO sign off with auditable proof that physical deliverables match the contract.

Physical closeout

  • Punch list
  • Substantial completion
  • O&M manuals
  • Warranty documents
  • As-built drawings
  • Test reports + commissioning
  • Attic stock + spare parts
  • Training records
  • Certificate of Occupancy
  • Final inspections
  • Asset registry → CMMS

Financial closeout

  • Final pay app
  • Lien waivers (final + unconditional)
  • Final invoices from subs
  • Retention release
  • Tax documents (1099, etc.)
  • Bond release
  • Final budget reconciliation

Convergence: Final acceptance → Sympl · CMMS asset graph activates → project moves to operations.

The handover

From submittal log to operating asset graph.

The data path ships manually today so the workflow is proven on real projects. Coming soon: the asset materialization agent so the path is one-click.

01

Submittals approved during build

Every piece of equipment, every fixture, every system component shows up in the submittal log before it shows up in the building.

02

Asset materialization agent runs

At substantial completion, the submittal log + O&M manuals + warranty docs + commissioning reports feed the asset materialization agent.

03

Draft asset registry in Sympl · CMMS

Equipment, manufacturer, model, serial, location, install date, warranty terms, O&M manuals, recommended PM frequencies — staged for owner review.

04

Owner reviews and accepts

Facilities Director reviews the draft registry, marks acceptances, fixes mismatches. On acceptance, the building is live in Sympl · CMMS.

05

First-year warranty WOs generated

Warranty terms + recommended PM frequencies seed the WO schedule. Day one of operations is fully instrumented.

Jobs to be done

Five people are waiting for closeout to actually work.

Facilities Director

When When the GC turns over a new building to my facilities team,

I want The asset registry — every piece of equipment with manufacturer, model, serial, location, install date, warranty, O&M manual, and recommended PM — already in our Sympl · CMMS the day we accept,

so I can I can start operating from day one without spending three months retyping data from PDF closeout binders.

Today's failure mode

Closeout binder is a 50GB ZIP of PDFs delivered on a thumb drive. Facilities team types into the CMMS for 6 months. Half the warranties are wrong by then. PM frequencies are guessed. Spare parts orphaned. The smart building is dumb on day one.

GC PM closing out the project

When When I'm 95% complete on a $40M project with 800 submittals, 300 RFIs, and 200 change orders,

I want To assemble the closeout package without a 6-week paper-chase,

so I can I can retire the project, free up my team, and get final retention released.

Today's failure mode

Closeout takes 3–9 months after substantial completion. PM spends 200+ hours chasing missing O&Ms, warranties, attic stock receipts, training records. Final retention release blocked by missing items.

Owner OPM accepting the building

When When the GC delivers the closeout package,

I want To verify completeness against my owner-side requirements (which differ from GC's contractual deliverables) and accept or punchlist with confidence,

so I can I can authorize final payment and not discover six months later that 40% of the warranty info is missing.

Today's failure mode

Acceptance is a signature on a form. Discovery of missing items happens during operations, when warranties are already partially expired and replacement parts are unsourceable.

Architect verifying as-built accuracy

When When I'm closing out my contract with the Owner,

I want To verify the as-built drawings reflect actual installed conditions (not the original design with an "AS-BUILT" stamp),

so I can I can discharge my professional liability and the Owner has a record they can trust 30 years from now.

Today's failure mode

As-builts are red-lined CAD prints faxed to the architect, who posts them as "as-built" without verification. Five years later a renovation project discovers walls in different places than the as-builts show.

Owner CFO validating final payment

When When the GC submits final pay app + retention release,

I want Financial closeout (lien releases, final invoices, retention status) tied to physical closeout (binder complete, warranties activated, training delivered),

so I can I can authorize payment with auditable proof that the deliverables actually match the contract.

Today's failure mode

Financial and physical closeout are tracked in separate systems. CFO signs off on financials without verifying physical. Discovers gaps in next year's audit.

Standards conformance

The paper closeout requires, shipped as defaults.

AIA and CSI are native today. LEED, FGI, COBie, BSRIA Soft Landings, and the German CAFM-Connect + DIN ISO 55001 packs for international expansion are coming soon.

  • AIA G706 / G706A / G707

    Available now

    Lien waivers, surety consent, final completion.

  • AIA A201 §9.10

    Available now

    Final completion + final payment.

  • CSI MasterFormat / CSI 01 78 00

    Available now

    Closeout submittals organized exactly by the spec section.

  • LEED v4.1 / v5 closeout credits

    Coming soon

    Credit-keyed task / document tracker.

  • FGI Guidelines (healthcare)

    Coming soon

    Healthcare-equipment submittal templates with Joint Commission EC tagging.

  • COBie

    Coming soon

    Asset-extraction pipeline export for IFC-aligned handover.

  • BSRIA Soft Landings (UK)

    Coming soon

    BG 54/2018 six-phase handover framework with explicit CAFM/CMMS data transfer.

  • CDM 2015 H&S File (UK)

    Coming soon

    Health & Safety file delivery as part of statutory handover.

  • CAFM-Connect + DIN ISO 55001 (Germany)

    Coming soon

    IFC4-based handover into the German CMMS regime pack with asset-management lineage.

Help us build the handover that owners deserve.

We're working with capital-program owners and the GCs delivering their projects to design the asset-materialization workflow on real closeout binders.

Become a design partner Explore Sympl · CMMS