Market-leading GC platform
Sympl · Project vs. Procore
The mobile field your supers will actually use, transparent pricing, closed-loop agents, and an operations handover Procore can’t ship.
Why teams choose Sympl · Project
Mobile built from the superintendent out — offline drawings and background photo upload, not a regressed app.
Public, predictable pricing instead of opaque per-ACV quoting and double-digit renewal hikes.
Agents that produce finished deliverables — Procore Assist and Datagrid retrieve and surface; we close the loop.
Closeout materializes the asset register straight into operations — no other GC platform owns the operations handover.
Side by side
| Capability | Sympl · Project | Procore |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile-first field UX (offline drawings) | Regressed | |
| Transparent public pricing | ||
| Owner + GC co-equal federation | Guest access | |
| Closed-loop AI agents (finished work) | Retrieval | |
| Closeout → operating CMMS | ||
| Schedule round-trip (P6 / MSP) | Read-mostly |
See Sympl · Project on your work
Book a demoMore Sympl · Project comparisons